Setting future foundation for South Sudan carry the solution of technocratic rule with system of federalism a case study of Scandinavian nations of Norway, Switzerland, Sweden, Finland & Denmark in northern hemisphere.

Setting future foundation for South Sudan carry the solution of technocratic rule with system of federalism a case study of Scandinavian nations of Norway, Switzerland, Sweden, Finland & Denmark in northern hemisphere.

By Dut Augustino Agei

Helsinki Finland

Someone define technocracy as system of government where technical expert are in charge of the ruling of the nation. A situation in which those who governed the country justify the accountability of the state directory. In the context of Scandinavian nations federalism are decalogue in which a country centralized powers under the ruling of prime Minister, monarch, ceremonial president and finally the royalty position in a similar country. In relations to the Nordic kingdoms, South Sudan parliamentary democracy system hauls the federal and state government working together in analogous country. As in South Sudan, the three kingdoms of Denmark, Norway and Sweden the installation of federalism are confederated in a devolution based where technocracy with federalism run the country in an example of parliamentary democracy, judicial system, military and paramilitary, the national economy and foreign affairs ministry therefore examine the South Sudan future foundation to come.

South Sudan being a parliamentary democracy the interlink between the federal and state government carry the solution of the future government of meritocracy whereby the de jure and de facto in both upper and lower house in senate and national assembly form a bicameral parliament under similar government of federal and state rule with system of technocracy where executive work independently. According to the Nordic nations the political appointees in the examples of ceremonial president, pm, monarch, royalty, have executive powers centralized in both federal and state government the South Sudan system of governments of the national assembly and the state assembly under similar technocracy that contributed into efficient making of the government between Scandinavian federal and state government as the national law makers.

According to the northern hemisphere nations the leadership of the militaries in both federal and state government are based on technocracy. The defense, police, social security, riverine, are assigned on technical technocracy under the agreement of the national and the state government only for public protections and for the defense of the national sovereignty of the country. In the Scandinavian nations of Switzerland, Norway, Finland the system of military leaderships between federal and state government with technocracy are under similar agreement of the country frontiers and eventually the sovereignty armory of the state. The Nordic federalist form of government under the system of technocratic rule with system of federalism carry the South Sudan solution of technocratic rule with system of federalism under the join militarization cooperation between the federal and state government.

In the context of South Sudan, the national economy of the Scandinavian nations and the process of antiquity between the federalist and the government of the state are around similar solutions of technocratic rule with system of federalism. A stratum in which the national economy and the state economy are runs by the technocrats of the kingdoms in a situations where technological advancement play some major roles between the government of the national unity and the government of the state. Economically the system of Nordic nations of the kingdoms of Finland, Denmark, Switzerland with system of federalism in both federal and state government within the agreement of senate and national assembly are around the liberalized economy under similar parastatals of two different government the situation of future South Sudan to come. In the economic wise the Scandinavian nations carryout the visualisation of technocratic system with federalism under the independent economy of the nations where equitable distribution of the resources put into considerations the national equity of socialism where bourgeois and proletariat operate under similar levels of jurisprudent of the country.

The summary of the Scandinavian laws in both federal and state government carry the South Sudan system of security wise scenario where the laws that are federal are similar laws that are state laws and the two laws according to the Nordic nations executed the lawmaking decisions that run the system of governance between the federal government and the state government in the royalty. The bicameral parliament are summoned by the used of federalist state system with consideration of technocrats system that formulated the laws that are federal and laws that are state under the act of parliament in the autonomous government of the two different government. Scandinavian military, parliament, national laws, economic of both federal and state define the national position of the international affairs. In relations to South Sudan the Nordic nations foreign relations with the world are around the ideological forms of Lutherans doctrine with the other forms of Christianity the case of Norwegian people aids. According to the internationalism of missions that are Scandinavian the system of royalty, human rights, humanitarian assistant and public diplomacy defined the national roadmaps of the Nordic nations relations with the world and eventually with the rest of the hemisphere membership within the feudal system.

In conclusion setting foundation for future South Sudan carry the solution of technocratic system with system of federalism of the economy, military, jurisprudent, parliamentary democracy, defense, ministry of foreign affairs besides the government led and conducted by the technocratic system outside the militarization. In the context of the Scandinavian nations the imagination of the future South Sudan solution of technocratic rule with system of federalism between federal government and the state government with the used of technology contributed into different levels of the Nordic nations form of being a first world nations in the history of northern hemisphere. Just like in Netherlands the system of technology upgraded levels of education, trade, security and the position of public diplomacy that promoted the relations between the federal government and the government of the state. The Scandinavian nations sustainable forms of development under the principle of good governance, state accountability and eventually democratization under the mannikin of the royalty in the kingdoms of the Scandinavian nations of Denmark, Switzerland, Norway and Finland. South Sudan social security system carry the solutions of the technocratic rule with system of federalism and the process may contributed into the general welfare of the South Sudan state transition from being a third world nations into first world nations. The end.

The views expressed in the ‘OPINIONS & ANALYSIS’ section of the thejubamirror.com are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not this thejubamirror website. If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email us @infothejubamirror.com 

Dut Augustino Agei is a Vatican scholar at pro peace institute University of Oslo, Norway, A member of South Sudan civil society advocacy group at South Sudan foreign relations politics and diplomacy (ssfrpd) he can be contacted at dutagostino@yahoo.com