By: Keluel Agook
The recurring military standoffs between Gen. Akol Koor and Gen. Lual Maroldit in South Sudan’s security apparatus are not isolated incidents but rather symptomatic of a deeper issue. These standoffs, which have dire implications for democracy, civic space, and the upcoming general elections and permanent constitution-making process, primarily stem from a power struggle to seize influence around President Kiir.
This article explores the multifaceted challenges posed by these power struggles and provides potential solutions to address them while safeguarding democracy, ensuring national stability, and protecting the rights and aspirations of South Sudan’s citizens.
Recurring Standoffs and Power Struggles:
It is evident that the primary motivation behind the standoffs between Gen. Akol Koor and Gen. Lual Maroldit is to gain influence and control within President Kiir’s inner circle.
These power struggles have repeatedly disrupted the stability and progress of South Sudan, undermining democratic processes and threatening the sovereignty of the nation.
By recognizing the underlying motivations driving these conflicts, it becomes essential to address the root causes to achieve lasting solutions.
Addressing the Root Causes:
To effectively resolve the ongoing standoff and power struggles,
it is imperative to address the underlying causes that perpetuate these conflicts. This requires a comprehensive approach encompassing dialogue, institutional reforms, leadership restructuring, external support, and the protection of civic space.
Dialogue and Mediation:
Open and constructive dialogue is a critical first step in resolving any conflict. Facilitating peaceful negotiations through neutral parties allows for the expression of concerns and grievances from both sides. By fostering a deeper understanding and building trust, a mutually agreeable resolution can be reached that addresses the power struggles and promotes a harmonious working environment.
Institutional Reforms:
Addressing the imbalances within the military structure is paramount to mitigate power struggles and standoffs. Conducting a comprehensive assessment of the power dynamics and implementing transparent, accountable, and effective institutional reforms will help create a more cohesive security apparatus. These reforms should focus on depoliticizing the military and ensuring that appointments and promotions are based on merit and professionalism rather than personal allegiances.
Leadership and Command Structure:
Establishing a clear chain of command and effective leadership is crucial for preventing power struggles. Defining the roles and responsibilities of each leader within the overarching national security framework will minimize personal rivalries and enhance coordination. By fostering a culture of professionalism, respect, and adherence to the rule of law, the likelihood of future standoffs can be significantly reduced.
External Support and Engagement:
The international community’s active involvement is crucial in facilitating a peaceful resolution to the standoff. Regional bodies such as the African Union and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) should provide guidance, assistance, and mediation efforts. Engaging neighboring countries and other stakeholders will foster a supportive environment that discourages further escalation of the conflict.
Protecting the General Elections and Constitution-making Process:
The power struggles between Gen. Akol Koor and Gen. Lual Maroldit pose a significant threat to the upcoming general elections and the process of permanent constitution-making. To safeguard these critical milestones, the government must assert its authority and establish clear guidelines for the military’s involvement. Strengthening democratic institutions, promoting civic education, and engaging civil society organizations will empower citizens to actively participate and ensure their voices are heard, thereby reducing the influence of power struggles on the electoral and constitutional processes.
Conclusion:
Addressing the recurring military standoffs and power struggles in South Sudan requires a comprehensive approach that tackles the root causes while safeguarding democracy, ensuring national stability, and protecting the rights and aspirations of its citizens. By engaging in dialogue, implementing institutional reforms, strengthening leadership structures, seeking external support, and protecting civic space, South Sudan can overcome these challenges. Resolving the standoffs and power struggles is vital to strengthen democracy, ensure national stability, and uphold the rights and interests of all citizens.
The Author is a senior member of the Red Card Movement and former Secretary General of the South Sudan Civil Society Alliance who participated in 2015 South Sudan Peace Talks in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, a youth leader who had been extensively invloved in various youth initiatives and politics since 2010 and currently living in exile in East Africa.
